Proportional Borda allocations
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we study the allocation of indivisible items among a group of agents, a problem which has received increased attention in recent years, especially in areas such as computer science and economics. A major fairness property in the fair division literature is proportionality, which is satisfied whenever each of the n agents receives at least [Formula: see text] of the value attached to the whole set of items. To simplify the determination of values of (sets of) items from ordinal rankings of the items, we use the Borda rule, a concept used extensively and well-known in voting theory. Although, in general, proportionality cannot be guaranteed, we show that, under certain assumptions, proportional allocations of indivisible items are possible and finding such allocations is computationally easy.
منابع مشابه
Stratified Median Ranked Set Sampling: Optimum and Proportional Allocations
In this paper, for the Stratified Median Ranked Set Sampling (SMRSS), proposed by Ibrahim et al. (2010), we examine the proportional and optimum sample allocations that are two well-known methods for sample allocation in stratified sampling. We show that the variances of the mean estimators of a symmetric population in SMRSS using optimum and proportional allocations to strata are smaller than ...
متن کاملApproximate Solutions To Max-Min Fair and Proportionally Fair Allocations of Indivisible Goods
Max-min fair allocations and proportionally fair allocations are desirable outcomes in a fair division of indivisible goods. Unfortunately, such allocations do not always exist, not even in very simple settings with few agents. A natural question is to ask about the largest value c for which there is an allocation such that every agent has utility of at least c times her fair share. Our goal is...
متن کاملSparse Dueling Bandits
The dueling bandit problem is a variation of the classical multi-armed bandit in which the allowable actions are noisy comparisons between pairs of arms. This paper focuses on a new approach for finding the “best” arm according to the Borda criterion using noisy comparisons. We prove that in the absence of structural assumptions, the sample complexity of this problem is proportional to the sum ...
متن کاملFair Division via Social Comparison
We study cake cutting on a graph, where agents can only evaluate their shares relative to their neighbors. This is an extension of the classical problem of fair division to incorporate the notion of social comparison from the social sciences. We say an allocation is locally envy-free if no agent envies a neighbor’s allocation, and locally proportional if each agent values its own allocation as ...
متن کاملFair Allocation based on Diminishing Differences
Ranking alternatives is a natural way for humans to explain their preferences. It is being used in many settings, such as school choice (NY, Boston), course allocations, and the Israeli medical lottery. In some cases (such as the latter two), several “items” are given to each participant. Without having any information on the underlying cardinal utilities, arguing about fairness of allocation r...
متن کامل